Idiomatic error handling in Zig?
I've been at this for a while now and still feel like a beginner. Be gentle, I'm new here.
I've been at this for a while now and still feel like a beginner. Be gentle, I'm new here.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Second this.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
dusky-lichen-63 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Could you share a photo?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The official docs are better than they look.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
The official docs are better than they look.
copper-clover-47 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
Small correction, but the point stands.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
sunlit-rowan-32 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Good question, following.
copper-reed-36 wrote:
Good question, following.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
slow-willow-36 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Could you share a photo?
dusky-finch-55 wrote:
slow-willow-36 wrote:
Same experience here.
This deserves its own thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
slow-willow-36 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The official docs are better than they look.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Good question, following.
Saving this for later.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
The official docs are better than they look.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This deserves its own thread.
sunlit-clover-44 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Could you share a photo?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Same experience here.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Second this.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Saving this for later.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
This deserves its own thread.
Could you share a photo?
Good question, following.
Second this.
Second this.
The cheap option was fine for years.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The official docs are better than they look.
The cheap option was fine for years.
pale-finch-98 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
gentle-birch-64 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
This deserves its own thread.
Good question, following.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Good question, following.
Saving this for later.
Same experience here.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The official docs are better than they look.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Saving this for later.
woven-alder-87 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Good question, following.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
slow-finch-26 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
slow-finch-26 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Second this.
Good question, following.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
slow-sparrow-87 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Second this.
late-pine-10 wrote:
slow-sparrow-87 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
slow-sparrow-87 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
mossy-wren-92 wrote:
That's fair.
This deserves its own thread.
Good question, following.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
silver-beech-97 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
This deserves its own thread.
gentle-moth-1 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.