slow-reed-401 more
The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
hollow-sparrow-93
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
quiet-wren-421 more
Saving this for later.
Reply
pale-pine-22
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
still-willow-22
Good question, following.
Reply
hollow-reed-86
Saving this for later.
Reply
still-lichen-14
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
dusky-thistle-25
The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
late-hazel-12
The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
gentle-willow-181 more
Second this.
Reply
copper-reed-6
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
mossy-yarrow-31
The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
woven-sparrow-89
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
bright-moth-33
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
woven-moth-98
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
gentle-heron-934 more
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
wild-birch-191 more
gentle-heron-93 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
slow-moth-17
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
silver-finch-431 more
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
wry-wren-21
silver-finch-43 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
late-rowan-391 more
Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
tidal-sparrow-60
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.