Migrating to the Linux kernel, any gotchas?
The community around the Linux kernel has changed a lot in the last few years. I've been at this for a while now and still feel like a beginner.
The community around the Linux kernel has changed a lot in the last few years. I've been at this for a while now and still feel like a beginner.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
The official docs are better than they look.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Saving this for later.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
amber-wren-33 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Good question, following.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
silver-beech-54 wrote:
That's fair.
Same experience here.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
This deserves its own thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Second this.
Good question, following.
Could you share a photo?
The official docs are better than they look.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The official docs are better than they look.
Could you share a photo?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
dusky-beech-23 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
This deserves its own thread.
The official docs are better than they look.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Could you share a photo?
Small correction, but the point stands.
wry-clover-73 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Good question, following.
This deserves its own thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
mossy-willow-64 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
This deserves its own thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
gentle-clover-88 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Good question, following.
Second this.
Same experience here.
Same experience here.
bright-fern-2 wrote:
Same experience here.
Good question, following.
bright-fern-2 wrote:
Same experience here.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
The official docs are better than they look.
Saving this for later.
woven-beech-44 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Saving this for later.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
amber-hazel-86 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
wild-sedge-20 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Second this.
still-pine-30 wrote:
wild-sedge-20 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
tidal-thistle-48 wrote:
amber-hazel-86 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Same experience here.
Saving this for later.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
bright-finch-11 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
mossy-heron-73 wrote:
bright-finch-11 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
The official docs are better than they look.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
wild-finch-5 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Saving this for later.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
bright-heron-30 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
wild-clover-60 wrote:
bright-heron-30 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Second this.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
misty-thistle-48 wrote:
Same experience here.
Second this.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
sunlit-reed-59 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Good question, following.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
This deserves its own thread.
Second this.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
misty-sparrow-38 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
Saving this for later.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Small correction, but the point stands.
The cheap option was fine for years.
The cheap option was fine for years.
woven-fern-15 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Good question, following.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Saving this for later.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Same experience here.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
misty-wren-26 wrote:
That's fair.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Could you share a photo?
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Saving this for later.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.