wireleaf

programming.testing

What's new in testing this year

sunlit-sedge-89

Photos and details in the replies if people want them.

hollow-reed-997 more

This deserves its own thread.

Reply
tidal-willow-172 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Reply
late-willow-891 more

The cheap option was fine for years.

Reply
copper-alder-76

The official docs are better than they look.

Reply
mossy-otter-683 more

Small correction, but the point stands.

Reply
wry-beech-25

mossy-otter-68 wrote:

Small correction, but the point stands.

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

Reply
copper-clover-311 more

Good question, following.

Reply
silver-reed-68

Saving this for later.

Reply
late-heron-10

The official docs are better than they look.

Reply
bright-wren-87

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

Reply
copper-lichen-57

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.

Reply
bright-heron-304 more

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

Reply
pale-otter-952 more

Saving this for later.

Reply
late-sedge-861 more

Second this.

Reply
silver-thistle-17

The cheap option was fine for years.

Reply
silver-clover-39

bright-heron-30 wrote:

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.

Reply
silver-rowan-62

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

Reply
hollow-hazel-20

Good question, following.

Reply
hollow-wren-212 more

Saving this for later.

Reply
dusky-pine-581 more

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

Reply
silver-birch-47

Good question, following.

Reply
amber-clover-78

The cheap option was fine for years.

Reply