Does anyone else find hand tools relaxing?
Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested.
I'll report back in a month.
Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested.
I'll report back in a month.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This deserves its own thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The official docs are better than they look.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Same experience here.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Same experience here.
The official docs are better than they look.
hollow-otter-95 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Could you share a photo?
Saving this for later.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Could you share a photo?
Small correction, but the point stands.
This deserves its own thread.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Same experience here.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
bright-willow-58 wrote:
Same experience here.
Second this.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
dusky-hazel-0 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Good question, following.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
tidal-moth-1 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Saving this for later.
The official docs are better than they look.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Saving this for later.
wry-otter-71 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
copper-beech-51 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
wild-reed-46 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This deserves its own thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.
The cheap option was fine for years.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The cheap option was fine for years.
Saving this for later.
The official docs are better than they look.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Same experience here.
gentle-willow-56 wrote:
Same experience here.
This deserves its own thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
still-wren-61 wrote:
gentle-willow-56 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
copper-wren-38 wrote:
still-wren-61 wrote:
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
silver-wren-91 wrote:
copper-wren-38 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
copper-heron-92 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Small correction, but the point stands.
still-wren-61 wrote:
gentle-willow-56 wrote:
Second this.
gentle-willow-51 wrote:
still-wren-61 wrote:
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
rustling-birch-85 wrote:
gentle-willow-51 wrote:
Good question, following.
The official docs are better than they look.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Good question, following.
wry-rowan-5 wrote:
Good question, following.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
dusky-sparrow-28 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Second this.
hollow-moth-37 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Good question, following.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
hollow-moth-37 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Saving this for later.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
bright-sparrow-15 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
silver-beech-61 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
copper-pine-36 wrote:
silver-beech-61 wrote:
Second this.
late-clover-89 wrote:
copper-pine-36 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Saving this for later.
The official docs are better than they look.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Saving this for later.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Small correction, but the point stands.
This deserves its own thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
amber-lichen-15 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Small correction, but the point stands.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Could you share a photo?
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Good question, following.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Second this.
Could you share a photo?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Could you share a photo?
Saving this for later.
copper-reed-89 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?