Debian in winter: how do you manage?
Photos and details in the replies if people want them.
This came up at work last week and I couldn't let it go.
Photos and details in the replies if people want them.
This came up at work last week and I couldn't let it go.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
quiet-heron-41 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Could you share a photo?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Same experience here.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Saving this for later.
woven-thistle-48 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
rustling-alder-3 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Same experience here.
woven-thistle-48 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The official docs are better than they look.
This deserves its own thread.
bright-moth-34 wrote:
woven-thistle-48 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
slow-reed-35 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
slow-reed-35 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The cheap option was fine for years.
This deserves its own thread.
Second this.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.
Same experience here.
rustling-reed-40 wrote:
Same experience here.
Could you share a photo?
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
dusky-pine-48 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Small correction, but the point stands.
amber-sparrow-38 wrote:
That's fair.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
dusky-pine-48 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Good question, following.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Could you share a photo?
bright-fern-46 wrote:
Good question, following.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Could you share a photo?
silver-reed-66 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
Could you share a photo?
Saving this for later.
Saving this for later.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Good question, following.
misty-lichen-63 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Could you share a photo?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Saving this for later.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Saving this for later.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
gentle-clover-78 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
This deserves its own thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
gentle-fern-8 wrote:
gentle-clover-78 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
rustling-willow-42 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The cheap option was fine for years.
The official docs are better than they look.
pale-finch-98 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
The cheap option was fine for years.
late-sedge-87 wrote:
pale-finch-98 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The official docs are better than they look.
This deserves its own thread.
Could you share a photo?
The cheap option was fine for years.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Same experience here.
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The official docs are better than they look.
This deserves its own thread.
Could you share a photo?
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Second this.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The official docs are better than they look.
quiet-clover-40 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Small correction, but the point stands.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Same experience here.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
slow-hazel-81 wrote:
Same experience here.
Second this.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Second this.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Second this.
Same experience here.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Saving this for later.
Could you share a photo?
Small correction, but the point stands.
amber-fern-92 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
dusky-sparrow-30 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Good question, following.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Same experience here.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
This deserves its own thread.
amber-sparrow-62 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Same experience here.
Same experience here.
The cheap option was fine for years.
misty-hazel-8 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.
Same experience here.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.