Unpopular opinion about C
Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do.
Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
The cheap option was fine for years.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Saving this for later.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
amber-birch-17 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
gentle-sedge-54 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This deserves its own thread.
The official docs are better than they look.
quiet-fern-6 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
This deserves its own thread.
slow-reed-74 wrote:
gentle-sedge-54 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Saving this for later.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Good question, following.
Good question, following.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Good question, following.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
woven-moth-98 wrote:
That's fair.
Saving this for later.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Could you share a photo?
quiet-reed-3 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
Good question, following.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Saving this for later.
The official docs are better than they look.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Second this.
copper-fern-41 wrote:
Second this.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
The official docs are better than they look.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Small correction, but the point stands.
hollow-hazel-60 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This deserves its own thread.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Small correction, but the point stands.
The official docs are better than they look.
late-birch-82 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Same experience here.
Good question, following.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
The official docs are better than they look.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Saving this for later.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Could you share a photo?
Second this.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
hollow-rowan-58 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
amber-hazel-86 wrote:
hollow-rowan-58 wrote:
Good question, following.
Good question, following.
The official docs are better than they look.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Second this.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
tidal-alder-27 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The official docs are better than they look.
Saving this for later.
This deserves its own thread.
bright-willow-15 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
bright-willow-15 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
pale-birch-14 wrote:
bright-willow-15 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Same experience here.
The cheap option was fine for years.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Same experience here.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
still-beech-58 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
quiet-birch-21 wrote:
still-beech-58 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Second this.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Could you share a photo?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
gentle-moth-28 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
woven-lichen-83 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Same experience here.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
slow-rowan-36 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Second this.
mossy-hazel-24 wrote:
slow-rowan-36 wrote:
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.