What's new in C++ this year
Most advice I find online contradicts itself.
Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested.
I tried the usual recommendations and none of them stuck.
Most advice I find online contradicts itself.
Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested.
I tried the usual recommendations and none of them stuck.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
sunlit-birch-80 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Could you share a photo?
Saving this for later.
misty-reed-32 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
misty-birch-24 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
misty-birch-24 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Could you share a photo?
This deserves its own thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
mossy-heron-71 wrote:
misty-birch-24 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
misty-birch-24 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Saving this for later.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Same experience here.
still-finch-62 wrote:
Same experience here.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Could you share a photo?
The official docs are better than they look.
tidal-finch-23 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
dusky-willow-81 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
wry-yarrow-24 wrote:
dusky-willow-81 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
dusky-willow-81 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Could you share a photo?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
bright-sparrow-18 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
bright-sparrow-18 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Could you share a photo?
This deserves its own thread.
The official docs are better than they look.
wry-wren-89 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
sunlit-hazel-20 wrote:
wry-wren-89 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.