Profiling Swift code: which tools?
This came up at work last week and I couldn't let it go.
This came up at work last week and I couldn't let it go.
Small correction, but the point stands.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
mossy-moth-15 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
silver-sparrow-86 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Good question, following.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Saving this for later.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Saving this for later.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
quiet-clover-40 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
This deserves its own thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
still-hazel-52 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Good question, following.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Second this.
amber-pine-43 wrote:
Good question, following.
Could you share a photo?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
still-fern-37 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
This deserves its own thread.
still-fern-37 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
This deserves its own thread.
This deserves its own thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
wild-reed-84 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Same experience here.
pale-moth-21 wrote:
wild-reed-84 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
wild-reed-84 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Second this.
Small correction, but the point stands.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Could you share a photo?
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
pale-yarrow-86 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Good question, following.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
quiet-moth-93 wrote:
Good question, following.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
wild-reed-84 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Saving this for later.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Saving this for later.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Good question, following.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
hollow-wren-32 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
woven-finch-8 wrote:
hollow-wren-32 wrote:
Good question, following.
The official docs are better than they look.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
amber-yarrow-76 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
This deserves its own thread.
rustling-reed-42 wrote:
amber-yarrow-76 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
amber-yarrow-76 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Could you share a photo?
The cheap option was fine for years.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The cheap option was fine for years.
wild-moth-43 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
The official docs are better than they look.
wild-moth-43 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The official docs are better than they look.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Saving this for later.
The official docs are better than they look.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The official docs are better than they look.
sunlit-clover-18 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Good question, following.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Second this.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Good question, following.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
woven-thistle-58 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Good question, following.
dusky-clover-83 wrote:
woven-thistle-58 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
silver-clover-96 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The official docs are better than they look.
Second this.
woven-sparrow-89 wrote:
Second this.
This deserves its own thread.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
hollow-sparrow-93 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Saving this for later.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
woven-sparrow-89 wrote:
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
dusky-reed-70 wrote:
woven-sparrow-89 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
This deserves its own thread.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
The official docs are better than they look.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
The official docs are better than they look.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Could you share a photo?
wild-moth-89 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
quiet-finch-33 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.