wireleaf

sci.chemistry

Small chemistry win today en.wikipedia.org

wild-reed-46

This came up at work last week and I couldn't let it go.

wild-moth-4810 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Reply
misty-wren-332 more

wild-moth-48 wrote:

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Reply
amber-clover-33

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.

Reply
amber-thistle-26

Have you tried asking in the local group too?

Reply
tidal-sparrow-223 more

wild-moth-48 wrote:

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Second this.

Reply
copper-fern-912 more

Small correction, but the point stands.

Reply
hollow-otter-951 more

Have you tried asking in the local group too?

Reply
slow-pine-20

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

Reply
bright-pine-5

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

Reply
bright-finch-171 more

Have you tried asking in the local group too?

Reply
rustling-otter-32

bright-finch-17 wrote:

Have you tried asking in the local group too?

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.

Reply
tidal-fern-722 more

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

Reply
wry-thistle-941 more

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

Reply
amber-beech-33

wry-thistle-94 wrote:

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

Reply
pale-pine-81

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

Reply
pale-yarrow-221 more

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

Reply
misty-birch-24

Saving this for later.

Reply
woven-moth-80

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Reply