sci.astronomy.astrophotography
Fascinating astrophotography paper this week
Photos and details in the replies if people want them.
sci.astronomy.astrophotography
Photos and details in the replies if people want them.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Could you share a photo?
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
mossy-otter-68 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The official docs are better than they look.
This deserves its own thread.
Second this.
Saving this for later.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Good question, following.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Could you share a photo?
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Same experience here.
Saving this for later.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Same experience here.
Could you share a photo?
This deserves its own thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Could you share a photo?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
This deserves its own thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Could you share a photo?
wild-willow-77 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
amber-fern-8 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The official docs are better than they look.
Saving this for later.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
quiet-thistle-47 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Same experience here.
amber-beech-96 wrote:
Same experience here.
Could you share a photo?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
quiet-thistle-47 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Could you share a photo?
Saving this for later.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Could you share a photo?
late-hazel-46 wrote:
quiet-thistle-47 wrote:
Second this.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
wild-finch-5 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The official docs are better than they look.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Small correction, but the point stands.
silver-hazel-18 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This deserves its own thread.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
The official docs are better than they look.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
slow-fern-18 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
silver-reed-68 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The official docs are better than they look.
Small correction, but the point stands.
The official docs are better than they look.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Second this.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
gentle-pine-22 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
gentle-pine-22 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Same experience here.
This deserves its own thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.
Good question, following.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Saving this for later.
Could you share a photo?
Second this.
Good question, following.
This deserves its own thread.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
wry-willow-91 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Same experience here.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
silver-fern-33 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
pale-sparrow-78 wrote:
silver-fern-33 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
wild-birch-79 wrote:
pale-sparrow-78 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Could you share a photo?
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Saving this for later.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This deserves its own thread.
dusky-otter-76 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Same experience here.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Small correction, but the point stands.
slow-yarrow-50 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Good question, following.
slow-reed-74 wrote:
slow-yarrow-50 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Good question, following.
The official docs are better than they look.
dusky-reed-70 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
This deserves its own thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Good question, following.
Second this.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
bright-fern-78 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
bright-fern-78 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The official docs are better than they look.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This deserves its own thread.