Good popular biology books?
Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do. Curious how others approach biology.
Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do. Curious how others approach biology.
Small correction, but the point stands.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Saving this for later.
Small correction, but the point stands.
The official docs are better than they look.
The official docs are better than they look.
tidal-finch-13 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Good question, following.
hollow-clover-59 wrote:
tidal-finch-13 wrote:
Good question, following.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
sunlit-rowan-19 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
This deserves its own thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Good question, following.
Saving this for later.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
copper-lichen-48 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The cheap option was fine for years.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This deserves its own thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
copper-birch-47 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Saving this for later.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
pale-willow-48 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Good question, following.
The official docs are better than they look.
Could you share a photo?
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
still-lichen-77 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
rustling-reed-65 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Saving this for later.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
dusky-sparrow-69 wrote:
That's fair.
This deserves its own thread.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Good question, following.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
This deserves its own thread.
This deserves its own thread.
This deserves its own thread.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
pale-birch-14 wrote:
Good question, following.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
bright-beech-67 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
bright-beech-67 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The cheap option was fine for years.
wild-heron-23 wrote:
bright-beech-67 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
wild-otter-53 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Same experience here.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Saving this for later.
bright-lichen-26 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
This deserves its own thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
woven-beech-99 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.