Weekly retro thread
Photos and details in the replies if people want them.
Photos and details in the replies if people want them.
Saving this for later.
still-hazel-94 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Saving this for later.
sunlit-sedge-3 wrote:
still-hazel-94 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
dusky-alder-1 wrote:
That's fair.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
bright-moth-10 wrote:
dusky-alder-1 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
sunlit-sedge-3 wrote:
still-hazel-94 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
still-hazel-94 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
copper-reed-10 wrote:
still-hazel-94 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Saving this for later.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Same experience here.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Saving this for later.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
sunlit-clover-44 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This deserves its own thread.
Good question, following.
The official docs are better than they look.