Unpopular opinion about birding
Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do.
Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
gentle-clover-8 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Second this.
late-clover-23 wrote:
gentle-clover-8 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
late-clover-23 wrote:
gentle-clover-8 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Good question, following.
silver-willow-78 wrote:
Good question, following.
Could you share a photo?
silver-willow-78 wrote:
Good question, following.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
pale-birch-51 wrote:
silver-willow-78 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Saving this for later.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Small correction, but the point stands.
woven-hazel-37 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The official docs are better than they look.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Could you share a photo?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The official docs are better than they look.
The official docs are better than they look.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
silver-sparrow-74 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Saving this for later.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This deserves its own thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Saving this for later.
Saving this for later.
The official docs are better than they look.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Saving this for later.
Second this.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
amber-birch-4 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
wry-pine-56 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Could you share a photo?
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Saving this for later.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
bright-hazel-99 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The official docs are better than they look.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
still-lichen-17 wrote:
That's fair.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.
The cheap option was fine for years.
bright-lichen-84 wrote:
Second this.
Second this.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
misty-moth-29 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The official docs are better than they look.
The official docs are better than they look.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
wild-finch-28 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
wild-finch-28 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
dusky-rowan-93 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Second this.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Saving this for later.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Saving this for later.
Good question, following.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
late-finch-62 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Small correction, but the point stands.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
wry-otter-66 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The official docs are better than they look.
woven-wren-67 wrote:
wry-otter-66 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
bright-lichen-92 wrote:
That's fair.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Saving this for later.
Good question, following.
Second this.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
gentle-heron-49 wrote:
That's fair.
Second this.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
wry-otter-62 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
gentle-thistle-27 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
wild-willow-45 wrote:
gentle-thistle-27 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Small correction, but the point stands.
slow-heron-48 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
The official docs are better than they look.
The official docs are better than they look.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
misty-willow-10 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This deserves its own thread.
Same experience here.
misty-willow-10 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
misty-willow-10 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
This deserves its own thread.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The official docs are better than they look.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
dusky-moth-27 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Small correction, but the point stands.
pale-willow-7 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Second this.
Saving this for later.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
This deserves its own thread.
gentle-moth-59 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
hollow-sparrow-63 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.