Anyone near Portland into linguistics?
mossy-thistle-94
amber-rowan-44
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
amber-clover-783 more
Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
bright-lichen-92
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
amber-sparrow-311 more
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
silver-reed-74
amber-sparrow-31 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Good question, following.
Reply
mossy-clover-723 more
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
mossy-pine-99
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
misty-willow-141 more
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
silver-wren-87
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
woven-willow-251 more
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
late-otter-99
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
still-moth-18
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
copper-yarrow-421 more
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
wild-sedge-24
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
gentle-sedge-911 more
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
pale-otter-12
gentle-sedge-91 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Good question, following.
Reply
still-finch-49
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
misty-beech-95
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
woven-thistle-59
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
pale-birch-141 more
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
dusky-birch-23
pale-birch-14 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.