What's new in embedded this year
Be gentle, I'm new here.
Curious how others approach embedded.
Be gentle, I'm new here.
Curious how others approach embedded.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
The cheap option was fine for years.
The official docs are better than they look.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
sunlit-rowan-38 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Good question, following.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Could you share a photo?
Good question, following.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The official docs are better than they look.
tidal-lichen-17 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Saving this for later.
tidal-lichen-17 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
rustling-sedge-46 wrote:
tidal-lichen-17 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Second this.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Second this.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Same experience here.
wry-beech-48 wrote:
Same experience here.
This deserves its own thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
wry-beech-48 wrote:
Same experience here.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Good question, following.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Small correction, but the point stands.
tidal-beech-73 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
This deserves its own thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Same experience here.
The official docs are better than they look.
quiet-fern-32 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Good question, following.
dusky-rowan-92 wrote:
Good question, following.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Good question, following.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
The cheap option was fine for years.
hollow-hazel-20 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Good question, following.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Good question, following.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Second this.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Good question, following.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
mossy-beech-84 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Good question, following.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
This deserves its own thread.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.