wireleaf

programming.embedded

What's new in embedded this year

woven-hazel-55

Be gentle, I'm new here.

Curious how others approach embedded.

misty-clover-39

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

Reply
mossy-heron-52

The cheap option was fine for years.

Reply
silver-sedge-59

The official docs are better than they look.

Reply
sunlit-rowan-386 more

Have you tried asking in the local group too?

Reply
tidal-finch-37

sunlit-rowan-38 wrote:

Have you tried asking in the local group too?

Good question, following.

Reply
gentle-clover-652 more

The cheap option was fine for years.

Reply
pale-rowan-361 more

Could you share a photo?

Reply
mossy-clover-85

Good question, following.

Reply
woven-yarrow-93

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.

Reply
gentle-lichen-30

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

Reply
gentle-birch-4329 more

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.

Reply
tidal-lichen-1714 more

The official docs are better than they look.

Reply
wry-thistle-80

tidal-lichen-17 wrote:

The official docs are better than they look.

Saving this for later.

Reply
rustling-sedge-463 more

tidal-lichen-17 wrote:

The official docs are better than they look.

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

Reply
silver-pine-312 more

rustling-sedge-46 wrote:

tidal-lichen-17 wrote:

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

Reply
copper-lichen-64

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

Reply
wild-hazel-46

Second this.

Reply
copper-lichen-488 more

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

Reply
wry-rowan-5

Second this.

Reply
quiet-wren-865 more

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

Reply
wry-beech-483 more

Same experience here.

Reply
misty-reed-431 more

wry-beech-48 wrote:

Same experience here.

This deserves its own thread.

Reply
quiet-pine-77

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

Reply
copper-beech-59

wry-beech-48 wrote:

Same experience here.

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

Reply
silver-reed-51

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

Reply
misty-thistle-86

Good question, following.

Reply
tidal-beech-7313 more

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

Reply
amber-hazel-86

Small correction, but the point stands.

Reply
misty-clover-394 more

tidal-beech-73 wrote:

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

Reply
wry-birch-66

This deserves its own thread.

Reply
silver-reed-762 more

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Reply
sunlit-alder-20

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.

Reply
rustling-rowan-60

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

Reply
slow-reed-935 more

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Reply
wry-fern-24

Same experience here.

Reply
quiet-fern-321 more

The official docs are better than they look.

Reply
amber-sparrow-38

quiet-fern-32 wrote:

The official docs are better than they look.

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Reply
dusky-rowan-921 more

Good question, following.

Reply
sunlit-reed-59

dusky-rowan-92 wrote:

Good question, following.

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

Reply
hollow-clover-27

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.

Reply
pale-sparrow-10

Good question, following.

Reply
sunlit-sparrow-512 more

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.

Reply
hollow-hazel-201 more

The cheap option was fine for years.

Reply
hollow-wren-57

hollow-hazel-20 wrote:

The cheap option was fine for years.

Good question, following.

Reply
dusky-birch-42

Small correction, but the point stands.

Reply
gentle-yarrow-422 more

Good question, following.

Reply
bright-willow-481 more

Small correction, but the point stands.

Reply
quiet-alder-6

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.

Reply
bright-pine-961 more

Second this.

Reply
hollow-yarrow-79

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.

Reply
dusky-rowan-54

Good question, following.

Reply
copper-fern-82

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

Reply
slow-sedge-98

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

Reply
woven-moth-86

Small correction, but the point stands.

Reply
slow-alder-3

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Reply
rustling-hazel-26

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

Reply
tidal-wren-28

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

Reply
mossy-beech-844 more

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

Reply
hollow-wren-302 more

mossy-beech-84 wrote:

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

Reply
late-moth-70

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Reply
quiet-beech-1

Good question, following.

Reply
gentle-pine-22

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.

Reply
mossy-yarrow-941 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Reply
still-sedge-60

This deserves its own thread.

Reply
misty-otter-14

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.

Reply
quiet-fern-99

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

Reply
still-hazel-94

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

Reply
slow-lichen-48

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

Reply