Old medieval vs new medieval
I tried the usual recommendations and none of them stuck.
Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested.
I tried the usual recommendations and none of them stuck.
Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Good question, following.
Second this.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
This deserves its own thread.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The official docs are better than they look.
Could you share a photo?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Second this.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
quiet-hazel-91 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
This deserves its own thread.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
misty-hazel-38 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
The official docs are better than they look.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Good question, following.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
slow-thistle-9 wrote:
That's fair.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Could you share a photo?
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
This deserves its own thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
wry-pine-90 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Small correction, but the point stands.
copper-clover-31 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
copper-clover-31 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
quiet-yarrow-75 wrote:
copper-clover-31 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Saving this for later.
Good question, following.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
slow-clover-2 wrote:
Good question, following.
This deserves its own thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
sunlit-yarrow-41 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Could you share a photo?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
misty-thistle-86 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Same experience here.
The official docs are better than they look.
The official docs are better than they look.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Saving this for later.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
gentle-yarrow-38 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Second this.
bright-finch-81 wrote:
Second this.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
bright-finch-81 wrote:
Second this.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
bright-finch-81 wrote:
Second this.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Saving this for later.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Small correction, but the point stands.
gentle-otter-36 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Second this.
late-moth-18 wrote:
gentle-otter-36 wrote:
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
bright-wren-92 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Good question, following.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This deserves its own thread.
wry-sparrow-76 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Good question, following.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This deserves its own thread.
The cheap option was fine for years.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
amber-otter-75 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
pale-pine-40 wrote:
amber-otter-75 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This deserves its own thread.
tidal-pine-1 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Same experience here.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.