wireleaf

sci.astronomy.telescopes

Old telescopes vs new telescopes en.wikipedia.org

wild-thistle-6
silver-otter-411 more

Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
pale-thistle-88

silver-otter-41 wrote:

Small correction, but the point stands.

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
late-hazel-46

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
copper-birch-594 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
woven-reed-113 more

copper-birch-59 wrote:

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Same experience here.
Reply
slow-beech-311 more

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
misty-wren-32

slow-beech-31 wrote:

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
mossy-wren-31

woven-reed-11 wrote:

copper-birch-59 wrote:

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
dusky-pine-56

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
wild-sedge-102 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
bright-alder-311 more

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
gentle-hazel-61

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply