rec.books.slow-readingrec.crafts.leather
Curious how others approach slow reading. Budget is limited, so I'd rather learn from your mistakes than make them myself.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
silver-finch-36 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Could you share a photo?
woven-willow-25 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
This deserves its own thread.
tidal-finch-13 wrote:
silver-finch-36 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
amber-birch-94 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Saving this for later.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Good question, following.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
slow-birch-38 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
amber-birch-94 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Saving this for later.
quiet-lichen-46 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
quiet-lichen-46 wrote:
Saving this for later.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
amber-birch-94 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Could you share a photo?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Same experience here.
The official docs are better than they look.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Same experience here.
hollow-moth-37 wrote:
Same experience here.
Good question, following.
Same experience here.
amber-pine-49 wrote:
Same experience here.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
amber-pine-49 wrote:
Same experience here.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
hollow-hazel-74 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Saving this for later.
Second this.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
rustling-fern-2 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
still-reed-26 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
The cheap option was fine for years.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The cheap option was fine for years.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Second this.
wry-clover-41 wrote:
Second this.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
wry-clover-41 wrote:
Second this.
Small correction, but the point stands.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Second this.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
late-heron-6 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
This deserves its own thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
The official docs are better than they look.
silver-reed-0 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Good question, following.
tidal-willow-54 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
This deserves its own thread.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Same experience here.
The official docs are better than they look.
This deserves its own thread.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
wry-beech-30 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
This deserves its own thread.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The cheap option was fine for years.
hollow-finch-6 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Same experience here.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The official docs are better than they look.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Small correction, but the point stands.
bright-sedge-3 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The official docs are better than they look.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Could you share a photo?
The official docs are better than they look.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.