Unpopular opinion about retro
bright-clover-26
Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested. Curious how others approach retro.
slow-rowan-106 more
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
gentle-thistle-272 more
slow-rowan-10 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Second this.
Reply
pale-birch-20
gentle-thistle-27 wrote:
slow-rowan-10 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
mossy-thistle-43
The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
bright-heron-3
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
bright-heron-801 more
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
tidal-sparrow-96
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
sunlit-heron-151 more
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
hollow-yarrow-96
The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
sunlit-moth-94
Good question, following.
Reply
copper-heron-88
Could you share a photo?
Reply
gentle-rowan-99
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
woven-finch-8
Could you share a photo?
Reply
silver-thistle-17
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
misty-beech-95
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
quiet-thistle-472 more
Second this.
Reply
rustling-birch-57
quiet-thistle-47 wrote:
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
rustling-finch-70
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Reply
wild-beech-251 more
Second this.
Reply
hollow-reed-39
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
gentle-hazel-65
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
wild-moth-43
Second this.