Old tech news vs new tech news
Budget is limited, so I'd rather learn from your mistakes than make them myself.
I'll report back in a month.
Budget is limited, so I'd rather learn from your mistakes than make them myself.
I'll report back in a month.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Good question, following.
The official docs are better than they look.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
bright-alder-31 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Same experience here.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
The cheap option was fine for years.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Second this.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
pale-finch-39 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Same experience here.
Small correction, but the point stands.
sunlit-beech-28 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Second this.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
wry-sparrow-46 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
silver-willow-67 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Could you share a photo?
silver-willow-67 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
The official docs are better than they look.
The cheap option was fine for years.
still-heron-98 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Could you share a photo?
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Could you share a photo?
Good question, following.
The official docs are better than they look.
still-hazel-52 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Good question, following.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Same experience here.
Good question, following.
amber-pine-49 wrote:
Good question, following.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The cheap option was fine for years.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
wry-moth-9 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Small correction, but the point stands.
pale-moth-77 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Could you share a photo?
The cheap option was fine for years.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Small correction, but the point stands.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Could you share a photo?
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Could you share a photo?
Second this.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
gentle-moth-57 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Saving this for later.
wry-wren-21 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Small correction, but the point stands.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Good question, following.
Saving this for later.
The official docs are better than they look.
Second this.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The cheap option was fine for years.
tidal-birch-49 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
This deserves its own thread.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
tidal-birch-49 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Second this.
Saving this for later.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
tidal-birch-61 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Small correction, but the point stands.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.