Following the Firefox discussions lately?
Photos and details in the replies if people want them.
The community around Firefox has changed a lot in the last few years.
Photos and details in the replies if people want them.
The community around Firefox has changed a lot in the last few years.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
slow-beech-93 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Saving this for later.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
hollow-clover-31 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
This deserves its own thread.
hollow-clover-31 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The cheap option was fine for years.
The official docs are better than they look.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The official docs are better than they look.
quiet-moth-83 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Good question, following.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Small correction, but the point stands.
sunlit-sedge-89 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Same experience here.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
dusky-finch-84 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Same experience here.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The official docs are better than they look.
This deserves its own thread.
Saving this for later.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Small correction, but the point stands.
wild-heron-65 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Could you share a photo?
The cheap option was fine for years.
The official docs are better than they look.
Could you share a photo?
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Good question, following.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Good question, following.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
The official docs are better than they look.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
slow-alder-3 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
This deserves its own thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Saving this for later.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
copper-hazel-53 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The official docs are better than they look.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Good question, following.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Good question, following.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
slow-heron-48 wrote:
That's fair.
Good question, following.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Second this.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Same experience here.
This deserves its own thread.
wild-hazel-26 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Same experience here.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Could you share a photo?
Second this.
sunlit-clover-10 wrote:
Second this.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
hollow-lichen-89 wrote:
sunlit-clover-10 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Same experience here.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Could you share a photo?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
late-beech-45 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
sunlit-heron-72 wrote:
late-beech-45 wrote:
Same experience here.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
sunlit-rowan-19 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
amber-hazel-86 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
This deserves its own thread.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Saving this for later.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
amber-heron-2 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Same experience here.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Same experience here.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Second this.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
rustling-pine-51 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Saving this for later.
rustling-pine-51 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Could you share a photo?
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.