The community around meteorology has changed a lot in the last few years.
I tried the usual recommendations and none of them stuck.
Curious how others approach meteorology.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Small correction, but the point stands.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
hollow-hazel-74 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The official docs are better than they look.
Good question, following.
misty-lichen-9 wrote:
Good question, following.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
The official docs are better than they look.
gentle-rowan-39 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Same experience here.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
gentle-otter-80 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
gentle-birch-64 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
misty-fern-53 wrote:
gentle-birch-64 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
This deserves its own thread.
This deserves its own thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.