Ranked choice voting: anyone lived with it for a few cycles?
Our state is debating it. I'd love to hear from people where it's been in place a while, good and bad.
Our state is debating it. I'd love to hear from people where it's been in place a while, good and bad.
It takes a cycle or two before voters trust it. The first count was slow and people panicked.
Local races are where one vote really counts. Our last council seat was decided by forty votes.
Independent commissions draw the maps in our state and it's been far less contentious.
Do you have a source for that? Not doubting, I just want to read more.
I'd be careful with that advice, it worked for me but I know people it didn't work for.
Honestly ranked choice made our local campaigns less negative, everyone wants second-choice votes.
Same experience here.
The second time went a lot better once I stopped rushing it.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
copper-alder-13 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Could you share a photo of how it turned out?
Same experience here.
The second time went a lot better once I stopped rushing it.
mossy-otter-91 wrote:
Could you share a photo of how it turned out?
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The clerk's office runs the whole thing on a shoestring. Volunteer as a poll worker once, it's eye-opening.
Read the ballot measures before election day, they're often more important than the candidates.
dusky-fern-70 wrote:
Read the ballot measures before election day, they're often more important than the candidates.
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for.
I changed my mind on zoning. More housing near transit seems obviously right to me now.
Do you have a source for that? Not doubting, I just want to read more.
Saving this for later.
Small correction: it was the other way around, but the point still stands.
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Small correction: it was the other way around, but the point still stands.
Ranked choice made campaigns less nasty here, candidates want to be your second choice too.
late-willow-50 wrote:
Ranked choice made campaigns less nasty here, candidates want to be your second choice too.
Same experience here.
The second time went a lot better once I stopped rushing it.