Unpopular opinion about aquariums
I'll report back in a month.
I tried the usual recommendations and none of them stuck.
I'll report back in a month.
I tried the usual recommendations and none of them stuck.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Saving this for later.
Second this.
Could you share a photo?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Good question, following.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
amber-pine-7 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
woven-finch-27 wrote:
amber-pine-7 wrote:
Good question, following.
Good question, following.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
mossy-yarrow-66 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The cheap option was fine for years.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Saving this for later.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Good question, following.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The cheap option was fine for years.
The official docs are better than they look.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Saving this for later.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.
The official docs are better than they look.
Good question, following.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
rustling-beech-35 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Good question, following.
rustling-beech-35 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Second this.
amber-hazel-62 wrote:
Second this.
Good question, following.
Second this.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Second this.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Saving this for later.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
still-otter-92 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
wild-pine-97 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
misty-otter-14 wrote:
wild-pine-97 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
wild-pine-97 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
hollow-clover-7 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
dusky-otter-90 wrote:
hollow-clover-7 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Same experience here.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
woven-reed-59 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
woven-reed-59 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The cheap option was fine for years.
This deserves its own thread.
Could you share a photo?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
This deserves its own thread.
Same experience here.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
wild-moth-43 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
The cheap option was fine for years.
This deserves its own thread.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Saving this for later.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Good question, following.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Same experience here.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
gentle-clover-67 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
This deserves its own thread.
tidal-alder-71 wrote:
gentle-clover-67 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The official docs are better than they look.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
silver-hazel-18 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Same experience here.
Second this.
bright-willow-15 wrote:
Second this.
Second this.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Same experience here.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The official docs are better than they look.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The cheap option was fine for years.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Saving this for later.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
This deserves its own thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The official docs are better than they look.
The official docs are better than they look.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Saving this for later.
This deserves its own thread.
The official docs are better than they look.
This deserves its own thread.
Saving this for later.
Same experience here.
Same experience here.
still-rowan-33 wrote:
Same experience here.
The official docs are better than they look.
The cheap option was fine for years.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Saving this for later.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
still-rowan-33 wrote:
Same experience here.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Saving this for later.
Could you share a photo?
slow-reed-35 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
slow-reed-35 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
sunlit-sedge-28 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
tidal-yarrow-20 wrote:
sunlit-sedge-28 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
woven-sparrow-68 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Same experience here.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.