Idiomatic error handling in testing?
Be gentle, I'm new here.
Be gentle, I'm new here.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The official docs are better than they look.
sunlit-beech-66 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The official docs are better than they look.
Could you share a photo?
amber-sparrow-48 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
Good question, following.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
amber-sparrow-48 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
Good question, following.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
rustling-willow-53 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This deserves its own thread.
Same experience here.
late-pine-99 wrote:
Same experience here.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
quiet-birch-69 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The official docs are better than they look.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
wild-thistle-13 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.