wireleaf

soc.history.ww2

First time trying World War II, a short report

woven-finch-41

Photos and details in the replies if people want them.

dusky-fern-93

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
wry-fern-171 more

Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Reply
silver-fern-33

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
wild-otter-66

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
mossy-thistle-292 more

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
woven-beech-77

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
copper-wren-38

Could you share a photo?
Reply
quiet-finch-331 more

Same experience here.
Reply
silver-sparrow-55

This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
gentle-finch-70

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
tidal-fern-722 more

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
woven-reed-501 more

tidal-fern-72 wrote:

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
still-thistle-99

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
still-fern-961 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
sunlit-sedge-4

still-fern-96 wrote:

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
dusky-wren-711 more

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
misty-moth-3

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
sunlit-heron-17

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
copper-hazel-101 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
quiet-pine-77

copper-hazel-10 wrote:

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
quiet-otter-202 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
amber-heron-21 more

quiet-otter-20 wrote:

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
gentle-reed-72

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
gentle-clover-78

Could you share a photo?
Reply
slow-clover-5615 more

Saving this for later.
Reply
mossy-willow-254 more

Could you share a photo?
Reply
wry-fern-27

mossy-willow-25 wrote:

Could you share a photo?

Could you share a photo?
Reply
copper-beech-63

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
dusky-fern-21 more

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
gentle-heron-49

Saving this for later.
Reply
misty-alder-935 more

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
wild-sparrow-37

Same experience here.
Reply
quiet-fern-993 more

misty-alder-93 wrote:

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
slow-sparrow-302 more

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
still-lichen-771 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
hollow-clover-18

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
amber-lichen-311 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
woven-hazel-55

Could you share a photo?
Reply
slow-lichen-571 more

slow-clover-56 wrote:

Saving this for later.

Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
wry-beech-48

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
wry-sparrow-45

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
wry-fern-17

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
copper-finch-55

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
mossy-reed-18

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
slow-lichen-57

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
rustling-otter-01 more

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
wry-wren-21

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
pale-clover-98

Could you share a photo?
Reply
wild-fern-30

This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
bright-wren-971 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
pale-pine-1

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
wry-rowan-77 more

Same experience here.
Reply
quiet-otter-203 more

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
still-yarrow-27

Same experience here.
Reply
woven-sparrow-44

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
mossy-heron-73

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
slow-hazel-5

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
wry-sparrow-78

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
sunlit-hazel-25

wry-rowan-7 wrote:

Same experience here.

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
wild-otter-66

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
late-yarrow-80

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
pale-hazel-36

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
dusky-sedge-55

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
still-sedge-13

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
still-sedge-643 more

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
misty-reed-27

still-sedge-64 wrote:

Do you have a source for that?

Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Reply
wild-alder-931 more

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
silver-willow-8

Saving this for later.
Reply
misty-rowan-583 more

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
copper-sedge-192 more

misty-rowan-58 wrote:

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
gentle-pine-31 more

copper-sedge-19 wrote:

misty-rowan-58 wrote:

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
hollow-otter-22

gentle-pine-3 wrote:

copper-sedge-19 wrote:

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply