internet.browsers.engines.gosub
late-beech-91
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
slow-yarrow-17
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
still-beech-281 more
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
pale-pine-67
still-beech-28 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
late-fern-671 more
Second this.
Reply
slow-sedge-42
late-fern-67 wrote:
Second this.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
still-moth-701 more
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
late-clover-38
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
bright-clover-2110 more
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
silver-finch-355 more
Good question, following.
Reply
rustling-hazel-26
Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
tidal-beech-733 more
The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
still-birch-83
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
bright-pine-771 more
tidal-beech-73 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
This deserves its own thread.
Reply
rustling-pine-51
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
bright-otter-331 more
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
bright-reed-19
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
gentle-lichen-12
Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
dusky-wren-61
This deserves its own thread.
Reply
amber-birch-17
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
gentle-heron-71
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
hollow-willow-431 more
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
tidal-fern-7
hollow-willow-43 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
still-sparrow-92
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.