wireleaf

comp.editors.vscode

Old VS Code vs new VS Code

mossy-sparrow-12
Old VS Code vs new VS Code

Curious how others approach VS Code.

Be gentle, I'm new here.

gentle-clover-83 more

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
wild-clover-28

Same experience here.
Reply
wry-moth-471 more

Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Reply
slow-fern-32

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
misty-rowan-562 more

Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
gentle-otter-801 more

misty-rowan-56 wrote:

Small correction, but the point stands.

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
wry-sedge-83

Saving this for later.
Reply
mossy-thistle-674 more

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
pale-beech-853 more

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
mossy-clover-852 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
silver-otter-691 more

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
quiet-willow-17

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
silver-otter-41

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
sunlit-lichen-73

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
dusky-birch-65

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
silver-otter-243 more

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
slow-otter-892 more

silver-otter-24 wrote:

The cheap option was fine for years.

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
woven-moth-1

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
gentle-birch-64

slow-otter-89 wrote:

silver-otter-24 wrote:

Second this.
Reply
late-thistle-33

Could you share a photo?
Reply
gentle-lichen-12

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
hollow-hazel-66

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
hollow-otter-22

Same experience here.
Reply
slow-rowan-32

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
hollow-heron-801 more

Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
wild-otter-58

Good question, following.
Reply
dusky-alder-19

Saving this for later.
Reply
late-rowan-11 more

Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Reply
wry-moth-16

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
pale-alder-20

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
pale-lichen-64

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
silver-sparrow-86

Saving this for later.
Reply
slow-birch-37

This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
misty-wren-265 more

Saving this for later.
Reply
quiet-willow-511 more

misty-wren-26 wrote:

Saving this for later.

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
wry-beech-30

quiet-willow-51 wrote:

misty-wren-26 wrote:

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
copper-moth-27

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
dusky-sedge-691 more

misty-wren-26 wrote:

Saving this for later.

Second this.
Reply
dusky-hazel-37

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
slow-clover-56

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
dusky-hazel-0

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Reply
quiet-pine-46

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
bright-moth-77

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
wry-wren-5916 more

Second this.
Reply
hollow-wren-301 more

Saving this for later.
Reply
pale-sparrow-10

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
bright-fern-923 more

wry-wren-59 wrote:

Second this.

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
woven-hazel-592 more

Good question, following.
Reply
wild-fern-831 more

woven-hazel-59 wrote:

Good question, following.

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
wry-hazel-68

wild-fern-83 wrote:

woven-hazel-59 wrote:

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
sunlit-thistle-993 more

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Reply
mossy-hazel-602 more

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
quiet-alder-6

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
quiet-alder-6

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
sunlit-reed-735 more

wry-wren-59 wrote:

Second this.

Saving this for later.
Reply
silver-pine-37

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
still-pine-333 more

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
tidal-beech-752 more

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
hollow-heron-61

tidal-beech-75 wrote:

Start small and stay consistent.

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Reply
wry-birch-66

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
gentle-moth-572 more

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
sunlit-sedge-891 more

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
wild-beech-12

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
quiet-beech-451 more

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
hollow-reed-22

quiet-beech-45 wrote:

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
wry-sedge-93

Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply