A question about basketball terminology
Curious how others approach basketball. I'll report back in a month.
Curious how others approach basketball. I'll report back in a month.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The official docs are better than they look.
Same experience here.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
hollow-beech-97 wrote:
That's fair.
Could you share a photo?
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
dusky-otter-90 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
The official docs are better than they look.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
The cheap option was fine for years.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
This deserves its own thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
bright-sedge-3 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
woven-otter-86 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Same experience here.
wild-moth-22 wrote:
woven-otter-86 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
gentle-hazel-62 wrote:
wild-moth-22 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
still-lichen-77 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
still-lichen-77 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The official docs are better than they look.
still-lichen-77 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Could you share a photo?
pale-pine-67 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
The cheap option was fine for years.
The official docs are better than they look.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The official docs are better than they look.
wild-beech-5 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Could you share a photo?
Second this.
This deserves its own thread.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Small correction, but the point stands.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
hollow-reed-99 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Saving this for later.
This deserves its own thread.
misty-hazel-19 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Could you share a photo?
Same experience here.
Second this.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
late-willow-89 wrote:
Second this.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Same experience here.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
late-willow-89 wrote:
Second this.
Could you share a photo?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
woven-willow-93 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Could you share a photo?
dusky-sparrow-74 wrote:
late-willow-89 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The cheap option was fine for years.
The official docs are better than they look.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Saving this for later.
slow-sedge-77 wrote:
Saving this for later.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The cheap option was fine for years.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Good question, following.
The official docs are better than they look.
wild-yarrow-67 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
rustling-sedge-38 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Second this.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
pale-beech-85 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Same experience here.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
still-hazel-31 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Same experience here.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
mossy-thistle-29 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
mossy-thistle-29 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
hollow-otter-72 wrote:
mossy-thistle-29 wrote:
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Good question, following.
hollow-otter-72 wrote:
mossy-thistle-29 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Small correction, but the point stands.
The official docs are better than they look.
Small correction, but the point stands.
slow-yarrow-44 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
The official docs are better than they look.
bright-pine-23 wrote:
Same experience here.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
This deserves its own thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
pale-hazel-36 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Second this.
late-alder-65 wrote:
pale-hazel-36 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Same experience here.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Good question, following.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Saving this for later.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Second this.
This deserves its own thread.
silver-otter-69 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Small correction, but the point stands.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Could you share a photo?
The cheap option was fine for years.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
misty-beech-10 wrote:
That's fair.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Saving this for later.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Could you share a photo?