What changed your mind about space?
This came up at work last week and I couldn't let it go.
This came up at work last week and I couldn't let it go.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
hollow-sparrow-21 wrote:
That's fair.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
hollow-sparrow-21 wrote:
That's fair.
Saving this for later.
copper-hazel-20 wrote:
hollow-sparrow-21 wrote:
Good question, following.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
dusky-yarrow-75 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Could you share a photo?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Saving this for later.
hollow-sparrow-21 wrote:
That's fair.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
slow-sedge-98 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This deserves its own thread.
dusky-beech-23 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
The official docs are better than they look.
wild-fern-22 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Second this.
slow-sparrow-47 wrote:
Second this.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Saving this for later.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
tidal-sedge-63 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This deserves its own thread.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The official docs are better than they look.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Same experience here.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
The official docs are better than they look.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This deserves its own thread.
Same experience here.
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Could you share a photo?
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Second this.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
woven-birch-26 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Same experience here.
The official docs are better than they look.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
wry-wren-21 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Good question, following.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
still-yarrow-97 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
The official docs are better than they look.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Same experience here.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Good question, following.
Saving this for later.
woven-hazel-55 wrote:
Good question, following.
Saving this for later.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Second this.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Small correction, but the point stands.
This deserves its own thread.
late-otter-17 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
wry-moth-16 wrote:
late-otter-17 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Same experience here.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
This deserves its own thread.
Could you share a photo?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Saving this for later.
Good question, following.
Same experience here.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
still-yarrow-22 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Same experience here.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Second this.
Could you share a photo?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
This deserves its own thread.
gentle-wren-35 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.