Following the search discussions lately?
Be gentle, I'm new here.
Be gentle, I'm new here.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
wry-sparrow-72 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Good question, following.
Could you share a photo?
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
bright-rowan-30 wrote:
Good question, following.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Good question, following.
Same experience here.
misty-willow-14 wrote:
Same experience here.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This deserves its own thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
tidal-thistle-51 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Second this.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
amber-alder-73 wrote:
Good question, following.
Good question, following.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Same experience here.
gentle-willow-51 wrote:
Same experience here.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
sunlit-heron-25 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
This deserves its own thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
This deserves its own thread.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
hollow-reed-36 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
The cheap option was fine for years.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
silver-wren-82 wrote:
hollow-reed-36 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Saving this for later.
This deserves its own thread.
Second this.
wry-sparrow-45 wrote:
Second this.
Could you share a photo?
bright-lichen-30 wrote:
wry-sparrow-45 wrote:
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
bright-lichen-30 wrote:
wry-sparrow-45 wrote:
Saving this for later.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
The cheap option was fine for years.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The cheap option was fine for years.
sunlit-sparrow-51 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
sunlit-sparrow-51 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Small correction, but the point stands.
amber-lichen-91 wrote:
sunlit-sparrow-51 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Same experience here.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Small correction, but the point stands.
This deserves its own thread.
Could you share a photo?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
rustling-beech-68 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
rustling-beech-68 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Same experience here.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Good question, following.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Good question, following.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
dusky-sedge-69 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
wry-birch-25 wrote:
That's fair.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
The official docs are better than they look.
Could you share a photo?