Old cooking disasters vs new cooking disasters
Curious how others approach cooking disasters.
The community around cooking disasters has changed a lot in the last few years.
Curious how others approach cooking disasters.
The community around cooking disasters has changed a lot in the last few years.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
Small correction, but the point stands.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
mossy-rowan-23 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The official docs are better than they look.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Could you share a photo?
This deserves its own thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
sunlit-sedge-4 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Saving this for later.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
amber-hazel-26 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Good question, following.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
dusky-otter-85 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
This deserves its own thread.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This deserves its own thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Small correction, but the point stands.
amber-wren-40 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Second this.
amber-wren-40 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Saving this for later.
amber-wren-40 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
silver-wren-8 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Could you share a photo?
woven-alder-81 wrote:
silver-wren-8 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
late-hazel-44 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The cheap option was fine for years.
misty-clover-39 wrote:
late-hazel-44 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
slow-sparrow-92 wrote:
misty-clover-39 wrote:
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Saving this for later.
The cheap option was fine for years.
pale-clover-1 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
This deserves its own thread.
pale-clover-1 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
wild-alder-16 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Could you share a photo?
misty-fern-6 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
The cheap option was fine for years.
wild-alder-16 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Could you share a photo?