The Linux kernel vs the alternatives, an honest comparison
Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested.
Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
bright-lichen-26 wrote:
That's fair.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Saving this for later.
Same experience here.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Small correction, but the point stands.
dusky-clover-25 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Second this.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
pale-sparrow-79 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
pale-sparrow-79 wrote:
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Second this.
Small correction, but the point stands.
This deserves its own thread.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Could you share a photo?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This deserves its own thread.
Same experience here.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
mossy-heron-71 wrote:
This deserves its own thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
quiet-yarrow-75 wrote:
mossy-heron-71 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Good question, following.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Could you share a photo?
Small correction, but the point stands.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The cheap option was fine for years.
tidal-beech-65 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
The official docs are better than they look.
sunlit-clover-10 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Saving this for later.
hollow-heron-53 wrote:
That's fair.
Could you share a photo?
hollow-heron-53 wrote:
That's fair.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
hollow-beech-16 wrote:
hollow-heron-53 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Could you share a photo?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Could you share a photo?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Same experience here.
Could you share a photo?
rustling-beech-19 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Saving this for later.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
rustling-clover-53 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Small correction, but the point stands.
rustling-clover-53 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Good question, following.
Second this.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Second this.
Same experience here.
Good question, following.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Second this.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
slow-finch-70 wrote:
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Same experience here.
Second this.
quiet-finch-33 wrote:
Same experience here.
Good question, following.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Second this.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Could you share a photo?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.