Ten years of slow reading, some lessons
Curious how others approach slow reading. I tried the usual recommendations and none of them stuck.
Curious how others approach slow reading. I tried the usual recommendations and none of them stuck.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Saving this for later.
Good question, following.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
tidal-finch-37 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
This deserves its own thread.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
The official docs are better than they look.
Small correction, but the point stands.
The official docs are better than they look.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
rustling-heron-14 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
dusky-clover-79 wrote:
rustling-heron-14 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Could you share a photo?
Same experience here.
hollow-pine-71 wrote:
Same experience here.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
hollow-pine-71 wrote:
Same experience here.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.
still-beech-58 wrote:
Second this.
Good question, following.
bright-pine-79 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
This deserves its own thread.
bright-pine-79 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Saving this for later.
The official docs are better than they look.
mossy-beech-84 wrote:
That's fair.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
The official docs are better than they look.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Saving this for later.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Good question, following.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This deserves its own thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Second this.
rustling-sedge-38 wrote:
Second this.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The cheap option was fine for years.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
wild-willow-77 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
mossy-beech-84 wrote:
That's fair.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
mossy-beech-84 wrote:
That's fair.
Second this.
Small correction, but the point stands.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
copper-reed-6 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Same experience here.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
The cheap option was fine for years.
woven-pine-17 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Good question, following.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Could you share a photo?
The official docs are better than they look.
dusky-beech-35 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Good question, following.
woven-wren-53 wrote:
Could you share a photo?
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Good question, following.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
gentle-moth-93 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Saving this for later.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Could you share a photo?
Same experience here.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Saving this for later.
silver-birch-47 wrote:
Saving this for later.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
This deserves its own thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
The cheap option was fine for years.
slow-sedge-47 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Small correction, but the point stands.
silver-birch-47 wrote:
Saving this for later.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
The official docs are better than they look.
silver-pine-26 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
This deserves its own thread.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
silver-pine-26 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Good question, following.
Second this.
silver-pine-26 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon.
Small correction, but the point stands.
misty-wren-41 wrote:
silver-pine-26 wrote:
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Good question, following.
Good question, following.
Same experience here.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
wild-beech-30 wrote:
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Small correction, but the point stands.
late-birch-65 wrote:
silver-birch-47 wrote:
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Could you share a photo?
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Small correction, but the point stands.
This deserves its own thread.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Second this.
Could you share a photo?
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The official docs are better than they look.
Could you share a photo?
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Good question, following.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.