wireleaf

games.roguelikes

What does your roguelikes setup look like?

slow-reed-35
What does your roguelikes setup look like?

Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do.

Be gentle, I'm new here.

sunlit-thistle-651 more

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Reply
hollow-clover-59

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.

Reply
mossy-yarrow-662 more

The official docs are better than they look.

Reply
still-birch-461 more

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

Reply
late-birch-65

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Reply
still-beech-48

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Reply
bright-yarrow-48

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

Reply
late-thistle-0

Could you share a photo?

Reply
rustling-otter-322 more

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.

Reply
quiet-beech-391 more

rustling-otter-32 wrote:

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.

Could you share a photo?

Reply
gentle-pine-3

Same experience here.

Reply
gentle-yarrow-3419 more

Second this.

Reply
amber-lichen-314 more

gentle-yarrow-34 wrote:

Second this.

Saving this for later.

Reply
bright-sedge-4

Could you share a photo?

Reply
mossy-wren-822 more

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

Reply
silver-birch-18

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.

Reply
silver-hazel-53

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

Reply
dusky-alder-4410 more

gentle-yarrow-34 wrote:

Second this.

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Reply
rustling-sparrow-424 more

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.

Reply
gentle-sedge-913 more

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

Reply
mossy-rowan-23

gentle-sedge-91 wrote:

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

The cheap option was fine for years.

Reply
wry-clover-61 more

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.

Reply
sunlit-birch-80

Have you tried asking in the local group too?

Reply
slow-pine-204 more

dusky-alder-44 wrote:

gentle-yarrow-34 wrote:

Small correction, but the point stands.

Reply
late-otter-17

Same experience here.

Reply
quiet-heron-77

Small correction, but the point stands.

Reply
misty-wren-571 more

slow-pine-20 wrote:

dusky-alder-44 wrote:

Small correction, but the point stands.

Reply
woven-alder-91

Have you tried asking in the local group too?

Reply
gentle-clover-882 more

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

Reply
copper-birch-75

Could you share a photo?

Reply
woven-willow-47

gentle-clover-88 wrote:

This is the most useful reply in the thread.

The cheap option was fine for years.

Reply
silver-wren-54

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.

Reply
bright-heron-30

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

Reply
woven-alder-55

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Reply
sunlit-lichen-86

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Reply
slow-heron-64

The cheap option was fine for years.

Reply
still-reed-52 more

Good question, following.

Reply
mossy-moth-151 more

Small correction, but the point stands.

Reply
bright-lichen-84

mossy-moth-15 wrote:

Small correction, but the point stands.

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Reply
wry-hazel-37

Could you share a photo?

Reply
misty-pine-391 more

Second this.

Reply
gentle-heron-19

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

Reply
bright-willow-35

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.

Reply
rustling-yarrow-807 more

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.

Reply
wry-wren-901 more

rustling-yarrow-80 wrote:

Do you have a source for that?

This deserves its own thread.

Reply
late-birch-2

wry-wren-90 wrote:

rustling-yarrow-80 wrote:

Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.

Reply
amber-beech-624 more

rustling-yarrow-80 wrote:

Do you have a source for that?

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.

Reply
tidal-willow-543 more

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

Reply
woven-clover-52 more

tidal-willow-54 wrote:

Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.

The official docs are better than they look.

Reply
mossy-birch-27

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.

Reply
misty-pine-39

woven-clover-5 wrote:

tidal-willow-54 wrote:

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.

Reply
late-finch-24

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

Reply
misty-reed-501 more

The official docs are better than they look.

Reply
gentle-moth-1

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

Reply
bright-fern-461 more

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

Reply
amber-wren-44

bright-fern-46 wrote:

Ha, I thought I was the only one.

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.

Reply
gentle-sedge-92

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.

Reply
gentle-thistle-27

The cheap option was fine for years.

Reply
quiet-sparrow-5

Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.

Reply
quiet-pine-461 more

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.

Reply
copper-reed-36

The official docs are better than they look.

Reply
slow-pine-20

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Reply
wild-otter-43

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.

Reply