What does your roguelikes setup look like?
Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do.
Be gentle, I'm new here.
Not looking for the perfect answer, just what you'd do.
Be gentle, I'm new here.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
The official docs are better than they look.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Could you share a photo?
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
rustling-otter-32 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Could you share a photo?
Same experience here.
Second this.
gentle-yarrow-34 wrote:
Second this.
Saving this for later.
Could you share a photo?
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
gentle-yarrow-34 wrote:
Second this.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
gentle-sedge-91 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
dusky-alder-44 wrote:
gentle-yarrow-34 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Same experience here.
Small correction, but the point stands.
slow-pine-20 wrote:
dusky-alder-44 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Could you share a photo?
gentle-clover-88 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
The cheap option was fine for years.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Good question, following.
Small correction, but the point stands.
mossy-moth-15 wrote:
Small correction, but the point stands.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Could you share a photo?
Second this.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
rustling-yarrow-80 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
This deserves its own thread.
wry-wren-90 wrote:
rustling-yarrow-80 wrote:
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
rustling-yarrow-80 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
tidal-willow-54 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
The official docs are better than they look.
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
woven-clover-5 wrote:
tidal-willow-54 wrote:
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The official docs are better than they look.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
bright-fern-46 wrote:
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The official docs are better than they look.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.