Migrating to crypto, any gotchas?
I'll report back in a month. I'll report back in a month. Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested.
I'll report back in a month. I'll report back in a month. Happy to share what worked for me if anyone's interested.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Good question, following.
Good question, following.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
The cheap option was fine for years.
hollow-heron-80 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Same experience here.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
silver-hazel-59 wrote:
Start small and stay consistent.
Second this.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
The official docs are better than they look.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Same experience here.
slow-otter-89 wrote:
Same experience here.
Saving this for later.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
pale-otter-96 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Small correction, but the point stands.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
copper-reed-10 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Second this.
Could you share a photo?
The official docs are better than they look.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
woven-yarrow-46 wrote:
Second this.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Same experience here.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Good question, following.
The cheap option was fine for years.
quiet-finch-55 wrote:
The cheap option was fine for years.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Saving this for later.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Could you share a photo?
Could you share a photo?
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Second this.
gentle-birch-73 wrote:
Second this.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
Same experience here.
Saving this for later.
The official docs are better than they look.
pale-birch-74 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
Small correction, but the point stands.
Good question, following.
Second this.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
silver-otter-85 wrote:
That's fair.
Good question, following.
The official docs are better than they look.
slow-lichen-48 wrote:
silver-otter-85 wrote:
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
The official docs are better than they look.
misty-otter-14 wrote:
The official docs are better than they look.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
This deserves its own thread.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
silver-otter-85 wrote:
That's fair.
Good question, following.
Second this.
The official docs are better than they look.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
hollow-yarrow-69 wrote:
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Second this.
This deserves its own thread.
My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Could you share a photo?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
copper-fern-41 wrote:
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Counterpoint: it depends a lot on how much time you have.
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
dusky-yarrow-72 wrote:
This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Whatever you pick, pick it soon. Waiting is the expensive part.
Second this.
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
mossy-thistle-49 wrote:
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Could you share a photo?
That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
silver-birch-56 wrote:
Do you have a source for that?
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Same experience here.
Same experience here.
Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Second this.
Agreed, and it takes a while before it clicks.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
The cheap option was fine for years.
Have you tried asking in the local group too?
Second this.
misty-pine-17 wrote:
Second this.
Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.