wireleaf

programming.open-source

Profiling open source code: which tools?

hollow-willow-53
wry-pine-1413 more

This is the most useful reply in the thread.
Reply
slow-beech-311 more

This deserves its own thread.
Reply
amber-lichen-85

My experience was the opposite, oddly enough.
Reply
misty-wren-324 more

I went down the same road and ended up somewhere completely different.
Reply
hollow-willow-50

The official docs are better than they look.
Reply
wry-clover-412 more

Ha, I thought I was the only one.
Reply
rustling-fern-251 more

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
wry-lichen-54

That's fair. I hadn't looked at it that way.
Reply
dusky-willow-132 more

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.
Reply
tidal-clover-91

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply
late-lichen-53

dusky-willow-13 wrote:

Strong disagree, but thanks for writing it up.

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
sunlit-beech-282 more

The cheap option was fine for years.
Reply
woven-alder-91

Saving this for later.
Reply
woven-thistle-67

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
late-rowan-902 more

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.
Reply
copper-wren-90

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
dusky-beech-35

late-rowan-90 wrote:

Careful with that advice, it doesn't work for everyone.

Start small and stay consistent. That's really all there is to it.
Reply
dusky-willow-13

I asked the same thing a year ago, the answers here helped a lot.
Reply
copper-moth-27

Do you have a source for that? I'd like to read more.
Reply
wry-clover-73

Nothing beats doing it badly a few times.
Reply
sunlit-rowan-23

Small correction, but the point stands.
Reply
late-sparrow-85

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for.
Reply